Before we get started with our Hot Stove League Wrap, I just have to say that while other blogs post questions about superstitions and favorite baseball songs, we provide hard baseball content daily....and sometimes more. Sorry, I couldn't resist.
Spring training camps open today with pitchers and catchers reporting. We've already had our first "best shape of his life" story with Justin Verlander saying "This is for sure the best I've felt in last few years." While there remain 7 of MLBTR's Top 50 Free Agents on the market, it sure feels like Buster doused the embers in his hot stove, which means it's time to review his moves, or lack of moves, and give in opinion on his inaugural Hot Stove League Season since taking the reins as POBO of the Giants.
It seems like many people rate Hot Stove League success solely by the star power of free agents signed regardless of cost and that goes back further than the Dodgers recent spending sprees. To me, it's a lot more complicated than that. If it's not, you and I could be POBO's if we just had the financial backing. I am not saying an organization with obvious financial resources like the Giants should be always looking for the most cost-effective deal either. You have to weigh short term with long term success in mind with a goal of building a consistent postseason contender without backing yourself into future corners. I am not convinced the Dodgers have not mortgaged their future for current dominance but that remains to be seen and may take several years to determine.
Buster Posey inherited a position that was spinning its wheels. Stars on short term, opt-out contracts always seemed to end up leaving for greener pastures. Free agent busts hung around soaking up financial resources. A whole shipload of intriguing prospects were rushed up and "graduated" yet none established themselves enough to be counted on. Buster's goal in the Hot Stove League was to try to nail down some long term star players to build around while sorting out the "wheat from the chaff" among the post-prospects. His mission is to establish stability and sustained winning defined by consistent postseason appearances and hopefully another championship or two in the process.
Buster got an early start on the Hot Stove League when he took over the Matt Chapman extension negotiations when he and ownership lost faith in FZ's ability to get the deal done. When that happened you had to know FZ was as good as gone from the POBO chair. That stabilized one position which was problematic since Pablo Sandoval left for free agency and thank God he did! The other gaping hole with no good internal options to fill it was shortstop. There was really only one good shortstop option on the market, Willy Adames. Yes, there was also Ha Seong Kim but he is coming off shoulder surgery with no guarantees when he will play again and no guarantees he will ever have the arm to play shortstop again. We saw way too many of those kinds of players come and go during the FZ tenure. Hard pass and that is obviously how Buster saw it too. He went after Adames hard and got him signed just before the Winter Meetings at close to his MLBTR projected contract in a brutal buyer's market. Who knows what FZ's approach would have been or who he might have signed. I have a very hard time believing Adames would have signed if FZ was doing the negotiating.
Although the Giants have a large stable of young hurlers on their 40-man roster they needed at least one more veteran starting pitcher to reduce the load on Logan Webb. Hopes were high for bringing Corbin Burnes back to the bay area where he played college ball at St Mary's but it was not to be. It sounds like Burnes really, really wanted to play close to his home in Arizona and Buster did not want to get locked into another long term deal, especially with a hated opt-out. Buster pivoted to Justin Verlander, an aging superstar who may have something left in the tank. Verlander may or may not be the guy to help Logan Webb take the pressure off the bullpen but there is almost no such thing as a bad one-year contract. Whether you like or dislike the Verlander contract, it happened almost solely because Buster himself picked up the phone and talked Hall of Famer to Hall of Famer and used his persuasive powers to convince Verlander to sign. That also would almost certainly have not happened for FZ.
Perhaps the most surprising Hot Stove League move was trading away Taylor Rogers. On the surface the goal of that trade was to offload salary but Rogers didn't exactly endear himself to Manager Bob Melvin and I get the distinct feeling Melvin and Buster see it as addition by subtraction for roster building. The Giants(probably GM Zach Minasian) brought in a small army of lefty relievers on minor league deals. It appears they believe at least one of those will end up being a better option than Rogers. That's the kind of move that makes or breaks GM's and POBO's so we'll see.
At several points along the way, Buster said he was looking for another hitter. He ended up signing Jake Lamb to a minor league deal which seems like it fell just a bit short of the goal there but it does likely leave more PA's open to help sort out the internal options. The other area of concern is a back up catcher who can play enough to keep Patrick Bailey from wearing down in the second half again. The catching market was thin but it's highly questionable whether Tom Murphy, Max Stassi or Sam Huff will prove to be the guy to give Bailey the consistent respites he needs.
While we have seen and heard endless debates about whether Buster could have or should have maxed out the payroll at the CBT threshold and he left a couple of minor holes unfilled, he did not make any glaring mistakes or sign any obvious "albatross" contracts. He now has some space to sort out the young'uns and enough ammunition in reserve to make a deadline deal or two and maybe another anchor signing or two in Hot Stove Leagues to come.
With all that said, my final grade for Buster Posey in his rookie Hot Stove League season is a solid B.
And Alex Bregman signs with the Red Sox for 3 yr/$120 M with an opt-out after each season. No thanks!
ReplyDeleteNot much upside to the Sox on that deal.
DeleteThe one that hurts is Pete Alonso. The really need that big bat in the lineup, even with the out close. Elderidge, is not ready to anchor the Giants lineup or play 1b or DH every day. He also might start the season in the minors. Polar bear would have been a great bridge option until Elderidge was ready.also Alonso gets resigned to a bigger contract you get 2 big bats for the high price of one since Elderidge is not albertary ready yet since he is still on a rookie deal. Big miss on Posey's part.
ReplyDeletePrediction: Giants 1B put up more WAR than Alonso this season.
DeleteAlonso had his heart set on playing for the Mets so he probably would have asked the Giants for a deal with a lot of opt-outs (like Bregman's) in hopes of getting back to New York. Since he declined the qualifying offer, it would have cost the Giants two draft picks and international bonus pool money. Since the Giants are trying to rebuild the organization, losing two picks and international money is probably not the best idea. I'm not sure if the Giants' 1B will have more WAR than Alonso but I think it will be close if the Giants' 1Bmen stay healthy.
DeleteDoctor B > I liked your review > I concur with your rating of Buster!
ReplyDeleteI like his apparent patience in his first kick at the cat!
Richard In Winnipeg
I think fans are too focused on what the Dodgers did so by comparison it feels disappointing. But in the last two years, we’ve solidified for the foreseeable future CF, 3rd, and SS. Combined with emergence of Ramos, the coming of Eldridge and Bailey, we are in good shape offensively. Yes, some holes. But as you say, yougins there to sort through. We’ve not been quite as successful at pitching but time to see what Ray and Hicks can do. We have at least 3 AAA types pushing a 5 man rotation. I can’t remember the last time we could say that.
ReplyDeleteWe are closer to where the dodgers were a few years ago—needing one guy (now they’re just piling on). That is improvement. Let’s hope our youth movement continues this year.
Glad Buster left some runway for the young guys
ReplyDeleteApparently there is a lot of deferred money but it's real...
ReplyDeleteThanks for all the good content you post, even on slow news days.
ReplyDeleteA's for signing Adames, assisting in extending Chapman, and not wasting money for bad contracts.
ReplyDeleteC+ for Verlander.
That's a solid B, but Buster did not satisfy expectations.
If Ramos and Fitzgerald falter as many yuts do in their 2nd year, 1B/RF continue their decline, Bailey's backup fails, and the pitching is not as good as hoped, it will be a long, cold summer.
What expectations did you have?
DeleteGood question.
DeleteIt's not really MY expectations, it's the Giants blogosphere (excluding you).
It would have been nice to get a solid SP to complement Webb, but it was never going to be, so we could only wish.
They tried hard for Burnes: A for effort, but prices got ridiculous for Snell, Burnes, & Fried.
Without Verlander, Roster-Resource would have the Giants at $201.5M, a good distance from the 1st threshold of $241M, BUT the best SPs got too over-paid, and Buster, to his credit, did not go there, and the Giants will rely on a lot of yuts, a whole lot, but it might work if Webb can hold up and Ray can regain his former self and Hicks can make it past May and Harrison develops and no one is lost for months.
In the outfield, YtY is a great guy, inspirational, and there are potential guys to back him and Lee and Ramos, but this is not a potent group.
Who could the Giants have gotten? Certainly not Soto, but they got nobody. Ramos is young and has developed, but 2nd year is often a high bar. Will McCray, Luciano, and Matos save the downside?
DH: Encarnación, backed by Wade/Flores, whoever isn't playing 1B. Is that comforting?
Backup infielders, assuming Fitzgerald can quit striking out so much, are Wisely and Schmitt (and Villar?). First base is "covered" by Wade/Flores, but how did that work last year.
Catcher: let's hope Krukow is wrong about Bailey, but he (Bailey) needs a credible backup. Should we pray someone emerges?
Not to be overly negative, but a whole lot has to go well this year to get out of 4th place in the NL West, almost a must to get to the Playoffs.
Shouldn't that be the goal? Is this a roster that will get there?
I look at it as the Giants are now solidified at 4 positions: Catcher, 3B, SS, CF. This time last year it was 2 and Lee's injury made it one. That's progress. I'm not going to grade Buster's season on a certain number of target wins or a certain place finish. Is he making progress toward a sustainable winning team. Yes, not all of the question marks will pan out but out of a very large group of post-prospects, I have to think at least one or three will. If every one of the question marks goes south, no free agent signings or money spent would rescue it. At some point they have to get some impact value out of the farm.
DeleteThe Hot Stove League grade of B is fair and I felt your third paragraph summed up a lot of issues. Buster stepped into a front office which did not seem to have a direction or the direction kept shifting as needs came up on the big club. It was important not to make a full fix in one off season and it is more important to have a sustainable organization. Your reviews of the top 50 prospects shows that the sustainable organization is possible and that the national pundits are probably underrating the system.
ReplyDeleteI also feel like you that the Dodgers may have mortgaged their future and its not as easy as buying players with high WAR off of baseball reference.
Again, thanks for the Hot Stove summary.
The Future is Now, in Life as well as Baseball.
DeleteLive for the now but prepare for the future. That's the motto I have always followed in my life and it's stood my in good stead.
DeleteSpring training always makes me feel optimistic. Everybody might work out fine!
ReplyDeleteHonestly, some areas I'll be watching closely include the crop of young starting pitchers. Somebody is likely to emerge as a legit ML pitcher, and more than 1 are possible. That's a very valuable position.
I don't worry about backup catcher. There are always journeymen available around the league who can do a decent job. I'm much more interested in Bailey's development.
Also, Encarnacion intrigues me. We might have the power bat we need, or he could be just another AAAA player. We shall see.
Mostly, I'm just happy to have Baseball to watch and debate.
I might be a harder grader than most, but i give Buster, who I love, a C and that might be generous. I don't consider excuses, rationalizations just result and where he has the team for this year:
ReplyDeleteC - staus quo..no problem
1B- Incompetent to be going into the season with FLORES/WADE/LAMB as your 1B.. And i don't want to hear about ELDRIDGE (who i love), but may be 2 yrs away
2B - Nothing was done, in bad shape
SS - Adames a GREAT signing
3B - CHapman (and will never have another year as good) extended begore Posey's new reign
OF - A giant mongolian clusterfudge . Not a single OFer doesn't have a huge question mark. Lee is scary to me
SP - Verlander on top of Ray is a HUGE risk...And Question marks abound on ALL the young P's as well as Hicks..But I do see the possibility for a high ceiling if a few young P's take the step forward. If Buster read this right, it could change the grade significantly
RHRP - Fine though DOVAL being a set up man has to be handled correctly (and to maximize his trade value) and not sure if Melvin can do it
LHRP - A total Mess with Rogers gone..way too much pressure on an inconsistent Miller and nothing behind hm
Just think Buster and the GM, if he does anything, could have done a lot better job.
SteveVA
Oh boy! I disagree with this take so strongly I came this close to hitting the button on it. There's an Anon out there who I regularly hit the button on who is easier to please than this. So my question is, does Buster write off every single one of the post-prospects and replace them with less "risky" veterans in a brutal buyer's market? And does he go all out for a one year run no matter how much that limits his options in the future? Because that's sure what it sounds like you wanted him to do.
DeleteSo now I will respond to your positional breakdown:
DeleteC- Personally I would have been a bit more aggressive than Buster looking for a back up catcher to reduce Bailey's workload but I just read a report that Tom Murphy is in the best shape of his life, so maybe Buster knows something about that we don't?
1B- Prediction(again): Giants 1B puts up a higher WAR than Alonso in 2025.
2B- With SS solidified, 2B is a reasonable position to entrust to whichever post-prospect or minor league signing steps up and takes the job: Fitz? Schmitt? Basabe? Meck? Again, do you want him to just write off Fitz and Schmitt and move on?
SS- agree, Adames is a great signing which should get Buster better than a "generous" C.
3B: Buster took over the Chapman negotiations so he gets the credit for that.
OF: Again, you really think Buster should write off Ramos and Lee? I could see trading YtY and going for an upgrade there but in a market where Michael ****ing Conforto got $15 M? Yes, at least one of the 3 presumptive starting OF's will likely disappoint in one way or another but then there is Matos, Luciano and McCray who you also don't want to write off before giving them another shot.
SP- Agree Verlander is not exactly what I had in mind at the beginning of the offseason but the market was brutal and again there is a huge flotilla of young arms chomping at the bit to get a shot. BTW, another blogger just wrote about 10 pages proving that injuries are associated with lower spin rates. Hmmm.....I think we already knew that or strongly suspected it.
RHRP: Agree we are OK there and Buster seems convinced Doval is salvageable and the talent is undeniable.
LHRP: Again, I am pretty sure Melvin and Buster were fed up with Rogers and see that trade as addition by subtraction and not just in $$. I dispute your characterization that there is "nothing" behind Miller. Zach and Buster brought in a bunch of pretty interesting LHP's as minor league FA's who they must think can perform just as well or better than Rogers. Again, decisions like that make or break POBO's but I'm betting on make right now. Oh, and remember the name Enny Romero. You heard it here first!
Again, an expectation that Buster would take the team FZ left and turn it into a roster to compete head-to-head with the Dodgers in one offseason is wildly unrealistic. He now has 4 positions solidified: C, 3B, SS, CF. Last year this time it was just 2 and Lee's injury quickly dropped it to 1. If 1 or 2 of the post-prospects emerges as another solid piecen or two and Buster adds another at the trade deadline or next offseason, then you start to see the wheels stop spinning and gain traction. So far it looks like he is on the right track with prudent signings and patience to sort out his young talent and let the keepers emerge.
People have different benchmarks or metrics for their teams. It may be # rings, W-L record, playoffs, standings, attendance, $$$, or even entertainment value. I hope for a team that is sustainable with a good farm system that continues to replenish the big league club, a club that is respected around the league, and have a decent chance of making the playoffs or winning the division. As late as 2023, there were no true foundational pieces on the team, with Wade, Estrada, and Flores being the most regular of the group. Now, there are four or five foundational pieces and considering where they were in 2022 and 2023, it will take time to re-build the organization.
DeleteI think the Dodgers loom large in the minds of many Giants fans.
DeleteDoc, I love this place and love and respect what you do, but, and i am not trying to be a pain, why would you even consider hitting the button on my post? It's just a different opinion. I know this is your place, and it is a great place, and you got the right to shut any of my posts or me for that matter down. And I guess that is all that matters, but, just in case it came across otherwise, I am not trolling or being disrespectful just giving my take as it stands right now.
DeleteAnd just a few responses...I don't wan Buster and GMZM writing anybody off, i want them to have the chances..but I think their are too many positions (OF, 1B, 2B, SP, RHRP) where they are depending on those "chances". As an example, i don't want to write off Ramos or Lee, but i am not totally convinced of either for different reasons..nor does Yaz thrill me and what about Depth?...I want the kids to succeed but just too man questions..Just way too much uncertainity for me. ONE player could have made a differ in my viewing. And then that would affect the other positions because I see 1B , 2B, SP (to an extent) and LHRP as similar issues also. I wouldn't mind some of them being open to competiton of kids and hopefuls, i just don't think ALL of them should have been left to hope and chance.
On the positive side, while i am concerned about both the vets and kids in the rotation, there is the "chance" that all breaks right healthwise for the vets and 2-3 kids stepping up. And I will keep my fingers crossed.
And if my head takes me one way, my heart is still with the Giants and hoping they do everything you say.
My heart wants Ramos, lee and Matos to excell in the OF. My heart wants Schmidt or Fitz to grab hold of 2B for the entire year. My heart wants Verlander and Ray to be healthy, for Hicks to be more durable, and for Harrison, Birdsong, Roup, Mcdonald,, Beck, etcc.. all take steps forwards...My heart wants MILLER to prove he is consistent (that's hard for relievers!) and for somebody else to step forward at LHRP, even if it's the guy you mention!
Oh, and as for the Dodger, I don't even give them a second's thought anymore. But I would like the Giants to compete more strongly with the Padres and other teams in the WC hunt.
Go Giants!
SteveVA
I think you are way too focused on this coming season and losing sight of the bigger, longer term vision.
DeleteDOC..Perhaps..I think about both...I just think Buster/GMZM could have done a better job for the present. And, outside of the SPs and Eldridge, I think You have a more optimistic opinion of the Giants farm than I do...But, in the scheme of things, our opinions mean didley, the players performance is what matters. Only time will tell..
DeleteSteveVA
I'm not bothered by whatever the Dodgers do. Its possible that they have just set up the biggest face plant in the history of sports. Unless they continue to replenish themselves with even more free agents, in three years, Freeman will be 38, Mookie will be 35, Ohtani will be 34, and Snell will be 35. For the Top Three, "load management" is not part of their vocabulary.
DeleteI'm encouraged by the off-season Buster had. He seems to want a team built around pitching and defense and have players who are gamers. The previous regime didn't seem to communicate what kind of team they wanted to build. Buster seems to want to give the boatload of young players a chance to breakthrough which is a good thing.. The 2 players I'm most curious about is Luis Matos and Marco Luciano. Buster needs to have a good read on Luciano this season especially because of his hitting potential and having 1 option left. I'm also factoring in that Andy Baggarly reported early in the off season that owners were cutting payroll before they signed Adames. Looks like he was right. I can understand maybe Buster and owners wanted to reset the tax so the penalties won't be as rich, 2 draft picks and international bonus pool money for signing a free agent who rejected qualifying offer. Just glad spring training is here.
ReplyDeleteThe penalty for exceeding the balance tax level escalates in the second year to 30% on overages and third year to 50%. Front office wants to start with a cleaner slate.
DeleteThe way Zaidi used the churn was to weaponize the 22nd-26th man on the roster and if they got hot, they got to play more. This was the way he used Muncy, Turner, Kiki, and Taylor with the Dodgers and Yaz and Dickerson with SF. The only deliberate direction I saw Zaidi take was to go after players that wanted to come to San Francisco (not a small thing) so he targeted locals like Joc and Judge. I think if Zaidi were in charge for the last hot stove, he would have gone after Sasaki, Burnes, Laureano, and H-S Kim (because of the local angle) and they might have lost out on Josuar. I think Zaidi would have lost Josuar because I think he might not have thought to deal Sabol for bonus money quickly enough.
DeleteIf Zaidi were still POBO, the Giants' free agent class would have probably been Cobb, Canha, Laureano, and Kim. And, as mentioned before, he probably would have lost out on Josuar. He would have been more reluctant than the current front office to move Sabol for bonus money because he is more emotionally invested in Sabol as the rule 5 pick he stuck with for 2023.
DeleteLuciano is working on corner outfield this spring.
DeleteAll things considered, 80-82 isn't a very high bar to clear.
ReplyDeleteMaybe Snell leaving the Giants to fend for themselves in game 161 helped set the bar.
Other than Lee, Bailey, and Flores, who had relatively poor 2024's, there is no reason to expect any player on the Giants to have a better OPS (or OPS+) in 2025 than he had in 2024.
ReplyDeleteRegression is very possible.
The addition of Adames will add some net WAR to the Giants, but at least 3 SF players are gone who had low but positive WARs last year.
2025 will probably be be a better team than 2024, but more improvement will come from pitching than batting.
Excluding 2021, 82 wins will be the Giants' best year since 2016, so that number, or any more wins, can be credited to the New Giants regime.
OK, first of all improvements from 3 players plus the addition of Adames is not nothing. That's over 40% of the lineup. At least two of those, Lee and Adames should be more than just a small improvement on positions that were smoking craters for much of last season. ln addition it's not unreasonable to expect progression from Ramos and Fitz and/or breakouts from at least 1 or 2 of the post-prospect guys.
DeleteAs I have said several times already, I think it's a big mistake to focus on W-L for the upcoming season only. Pretty much anything can happen over the course of one season. What I am looking for is evidence of building a team that can make a sustained run at getting into the postseason. At this time last season the Giants had just 1 or maybe 2 positions locked down for the future: C and CF. This year there are at least 4: C, CF, 3B and SS plus the possibility of a young player or two establishing themselves and payroll room for Buster to add during the season and future Hot Stove Leagues.
I'll try one more time to express better what I have tried to say in multiple responses to comments here. It was never realistic for us to think Buster could turn the team he inherited into the team we want it to be in one offseason and I don't recall him ever saying he thought he could either. Buster took over the team because it needed stability and direction in decisionmaking. If you are only focused on a projected W-L record for one season, it might be hard to see but if you stand back and look at the bigger picture this team is significantly farther along than at this time last year. Last year if you squinted hard you could see possible cornerstone players at 2 positions: Catcher and CF. This year it's at least 4 with two more possibles: C, CF, 3B, SS. Add Ramos and Fitz into the possible category in LF and 2B. The 1B of the future is on the immediate horizon but needs just a bit more seasoning. The next step is identifying 1 or 2 more out of the post-prospects and sorting and finding the right roles for the raft of pitching prospects and post-prospects. Add in the payroll flexibility to add upgrades mid-season and next offseason and I think this organization is headed in the right direction. One more think we haven't talked about his the leadership factor in Chapman, Adames and Verlander. Logan Webb is a leader but too often it seemed like he was a lonely voice. Chapman emerged as a leader last season and now Adames and Verlander are known leadership qualities. We may not be able to measure that in WAR scores but it can make a difference in team performance.
ReplyDeleteI'm hoping that Verlander can be the 2025 version of Randy Johnson of 2009. Johnson talked baseball all the time and impressed a lot of young players on that team, including the current POBO. Johnson helped Jonathan Sanchez develop and kept the other young pitchers focused.
DeleteI am concerned about Fitz's K rate and high BABIP. I am not convinced he is the answer at 2B and they might go to Schmitt sooner than later. I think the eventual 2B is going to being Meckler.
DeleteI heard Wotus say yesterday that Schmidt and Wisely are in the mix. And Schmidt could be a darn good 2nd baseman. I'm a Schmidt fan or I was happy to hear that.
DeleteDoc, I just wanted to give a note of appreciation to you. I hope you are enjoying your retirement, and for fostering the best Giants community. Really enjoyed the activity here and the thoughtful discussion you encourage.
ReplyDeleteBest,
Fan
If Chapman's extension is credited to Buster and that Chapman would have opted out and tested Free Agency based on the Year he had, then Buster in adding Chapman and Adames has had a remarkable role even if SF fails again to reach the Playoffs.
ReplyDeleteIt has to be admitted, however, the bulk of the team, including the initial signing Chapman last year so that he will be a Giant next year, excepting Ramos, Webb, and a few other pitchers such as Rogers, Duval, Walker, Winn, and Rodriguez was drafted and/or signed by Zaidi. Luciano and Matos also precede FZ.
All the backbiting of FZ omits recognition of his contributions.
I've always said FZ did some good things. Whether he was directly responsible, the Latin American program is in much better shape than when he took over(although Luciano and Matos were signed under the Evans regime so maybe that trend started earlier?). FZ also undeniably found some undervalued players in The Churn and recognizing bounceback candidates, especially on the pitching side. Unfortunately he was never able to find traction at the MLB level and it appears he was an extremely poor communicator and delegator. Yes, he got Chapman and Snell on decent short-term deals but where did that leave him and the team if they both moved on? Buster Posey and Giants ownership obviously did not think FZ was going to get Chapman re-signed. Posey stepped in and that was the signal that FZ was done.
DeleteFZ had faults but after a slow start he drafted well, signed Latin players, picked up some FA talent, and kept the Giants afloat, with but one Playoff team, which mostly rode older players.
DeleteHe did not close the gap with the Big Spenders.
The Dodgers particularly, along with the Yankees, Mets, Phillies, Rangers, Astros, Braves spend without limits and make the Playoffs.
Only a couple of last years "over the threshold" spenders — the Cubs and Giants — didn't make the post season.
A few of lower payrolls filled the 12 playoff teams but only the most egregious made the WS.
Most fans want an end to this. All other major sports have a cap but the MLBPA will not even consider it.
What was THE SPORT in my youth has been surpassed.
MLB and especially the Top teams need the leagues. Perhaps the profligate teams, especially LAD, will get their comeuppance, but they need the Marlins and Rays and even the A's: don't legacy teams in Pittsburgh and Cincinnati deserve a shot?
I remember only too well 1960: what a Series!
It was surprising to learn that Zaidi was a poor communicator. When he was on the radio, he sounded very articulate but he never really gave away too much information. I heard he was a friendly guy who was able to play fantasy sports, discuss movies and music and so forth but most of his mis-communications came in the off-seasons.
DeleteWe're gonna find in a year or two if Posey is being handcuffed by ownership or if they are just saving and getting ready to fight the dodgers in the imminent CBA talks that are about to come with a possible salary cap.
ReplyDelete